“A growing body of research illustrates that the effects of utility-scale wind energy production can be far reaching and some times have large and unexpected consequences for biodiversity. Furthermore, achieving renewable energy targets will require converting large areas of land to support wind power . . . often located in remote and high-biodiversity areas.” (- Nature Reviews Biodiversity, below)
MasterResource has long given voice to the ecological problems of industrial wind power, onshore and offshore, including:
Wind vs. Ecology in Australia (Nick Cater reports) (October 18, 2024)
Industrial Wind vs. Deep Ecology: Surface Impacts (January 16, 2024)
Industrial Wind Plants: Bad Economics, Bad Ecology (Jon Boone: October 24, 2009)
Vineyard Wind: Catastrophic Failure (‘sharp fiberglass shards’ close Nantucket beaches) (July 18, 2024)
Offshore Wind: Ecologists Tip-Toe into the Negatives (August 23, 2022)
Wind Turbines and Birds: Latest from the American Bird Conservancy (June 14, 2021)
Add to the literature an article recently published in Nature Reviews Biodiversity, “Impacts of Onshore Wind Energy Production on Biodiversity” (September 8, 2025).…

“Let the record show a rational voice responding to irrational, emotive, magical thinkers. Ken Brook, take a bow for history.”
The critics of climate alarm and forced energy transformation are winning on social media also. A recent example is a response to a post by David Ritter, CEO of Greenpeace Australia Pacific, who tried to take the moral high ground against fossil fuels. But one energy realist, Ken Brook, was right there with an effective rebuttal.
Ritter wrote:
…The mental gymnastics on display by the gas industry and their pals in politics deserves an Olympic medal. Responding to our bold action at yesterday’s Australian Domestic Gas Outlook conference, the likes of Minerals Council of Australia chief Tania Constable and Nationals Leader Matt Canavan are doubling down on fossil fuel extraction as the solution.