A Free-Market Energy Blog

Jimmy Carter Was Right?

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- September 17, 2020

“Jimmy Carter was right in exhorting Americans to turn down their thermostats, even if he did look nerdy in a cardigan while urging us to do so.”

“An energy crisis is again upon us. Soaring gasoline prices and oil imports are daggers aimed at the heart of our stumbling economy.”

– Joseph Wheelan, “Is it Safe Now to Admit Jimmy Carter Was Right?” (July 2008).

It’s back to Jimmy Carter with the Biden/Harris (or Harris/Biden) ticket. The Democrats might not admit as much, but the “soft energy path” of the 1970s is back in vogue with climate change replacing fears of oil and gas depletion and of oil imports.

Consider this piece by Joseph Wheelan, “Is it Safe Now to Admit Jimmy Carter Was Right?” (July 2008) that with some updating on the villains could pass for an op-ed today.

It begins:

Americans, who hate to be told they must change, roundly condemned Jimmy Carter’s memorable “Crisis of Confidence” speech of July 15, 1979. In it, Carter outlined a program for achieving energy independence: “On the battlefield of energy we can win for our nation a new confidence, and we can seize control again of our common destiny.”

Wheelan then gets cocky:

We admirers have long endured ridicule whenever we dared to defend Carter’s prescient plan for reducing U.S. dependence on oil.

But the author gets himself in trouble with his depletionism/alarmism.

We admirers have long endured ridicule whenever we dared to defend Carter’s prescient plan for reducing U.S. dependence on oil.

But today, after all the abuse and scorn heaped on Jimmy Carter and his supporters, we find ourselves paying more than $4 a gallon at the pump to fill our hulking gas guzzlers.

It turns out that Carter was right after all.

Carter’s litany of proposed energy mandates, Wheelan states, were all needed to save the world from oil imports.

[Carter] was right in seeking to raise the fleet auto mileage standard to 48 miles per gallon by 1995. (Even U.S. automakers admitted at the time that they could easily achieve 30 mph by 1985.)

Jimmy Carter was right in exhorting Americans to turn down their thermostats, even if he did look nerdy in a cardigan while urging us to do so.

… he was right when he said, “I am tonight setting a clear goal for the energy policy of the United States. Beginning this moment, this nation will never use more foreign oil than we did in 1977 — never.” …..

He was right to encourage fuel conservation by proposing a 50-cents-per-gallon tax on gasoline and a fee on imported oil — in effect, a floor for fuel prices.

Invoking the pioneering spirit of the 1960s’ moon mission, he was right to recommend a tax on windfall oil profits to finance a crash program to develop affordable synthetic fuels.

Jimmy Carter was correct, too, in setting a goal of obtaining 20 percent of our energy from solar power by the year 2000.

Taxes, tariffs, renewable mandates, synthetic fuels, “windfall profits” tax–and central planning to achieve macro goals? It all seemed right to Wheelan in mid-2008, but

We balked, and his energy program, which was new and demanding, shriveled up and died. When oil prices began declining in the 1980s, the justification for change vanished altogether. The Reagan administration junked the proposed 1995 mileage standard and the rest of the Carter agenda.

Amazingly, amid today’s record gasoline prices, Congress even now doesn’t quite get it.

And federal wind power and solar power subsidies–extend, extend, extend.

… Congress has failed to take the simple step of renewing federal tax credits for wind and solar power that will expire at year’s end. Every week of congressional foot-dragging on renewing the tax credits further dries up venture capital for critical solar and projects.

After a “de facto U.S. energy policy” that rejected Carter’s, the nation was back to Carter’s “moral equivalent of war” of two decades before. In Wheelan’s words:

And now we are in the exact bind that Jimmy Carter tried to prevent three decades ago, when we were reeling from the concussive effects of oil supply disruptions in 1973 and 1979. Acting with promptness difficult to fathom today, our elected leaders then enacted year-around Daylight Savings Time, dropped the speed limit to 55, and established government price controls. And, oh so fleetingly, we downsized what we drove. All gone.

Oil Imports: Then and Now

Consequently, the United States last year imported 3.6 billion barrels of oil, three times the 1.2 million barrels imported in 1973. We not only are consuming record amounts of oil, we import nearly 60 percent of it, about 13 million barrels per day. In 1977, U.S. oil imports totaled 8.5 million barrels a day, or 46 percent of consumption.

Remember, under Carter’s energy plan we were to hold the line at the 1977 oil import figure, in barrels. Had we done this, the percentage of U.S. oil imported today would be around 40 percent. Additional savings from Carter’s conservation and his alternative energy and synthetic fuel programs would surely have cut oil imports even further.

But it happened so fast, we say.

In 2019, the U.S. imported just over 9 million daily barrels of oil from 90 countries. But the U.S. exported about 8.5 million barrels/day to almost 190 countries! This was totally unforeseen by the bring-back-Carter author, Joseph Wheelan.

Jimmy Carter Redux

An energy crisis is again upon us. Soaring gasoline prices and oil imports are daggers aimed at the heart of our stumbling economy.

It is time to give Jimmy Carter’s proposals a second hearing.

This is what he said in July 1979: “You know we can do it. We have the natural resources. We have more oil in our shale alone than several Saudi Arabias. We have more coal than any nation on Earth. We have the world’s highest level of technology. We have the most skilled work force, with innovative genius, and I firmly believe that we have the national will to win this war.”


Conclustion

Wrong-way Wheelen needed to check his premises. When a pundit starts crying “Crisis,” people should ask three questions: How did government intervention cause or exacerbate the situation? How would new government intervention make the situation worse? How could government improve the situation by removing economic interventions?

4 Comments


  1. Jimmy Carter Was Right?Climate- Science.press | Climate- Science.press  

    […] post Jimmy Carter Was Right? appeared first on Master […]

    Reply

  2. Denis Rushworth  

    Would Mr. Wheelan be upset if someone leaked to him the information that US oil production is just a wee bit shy of covering all of our current oil needs? We still import large amounts, mostly from Canada and Mexico, little from the oil cartels of Carter’s time, because many of our refineries like their kind of oil. We export equally large amounts of our oil to refineries elsewhere that like our kind of oil. It’s called commerce. Works well. No shortages. No threats of embargoes as in Carters time. Carter may have been right for his time, but not ours.

    Use your judgement as whether or not to tell him.

    Reply

  3. John Garrett  

    Mr. Wheelan, along with almost all the crystal ball gazers and seers (including those of Wall Street and those on the Potomac) were 100%, dead, flat WRONG about domestic production.

    Reply

  4. M. Green  

    How’s that global commerce working out for us now, Mr. Rushworth?

    We’re still at the mercy of the evil house of saud, whose absurdly high profit margins mock our attempts at anti-trust policies and who can still mock and manipulate us after 50 years because we have moved so reluctantly and thus slowly on renewables.

    While we could’ve been in decent shape with better policies, we’re exporting about a third of our oil, thanks to greedy Republicans allowing the export rule to be slipped into legislation.

    Had gullible Americans not fallen for the slick acting job of Reagan, that is, until he fully lost his mind, there would be no energy crisis.

    Reply

Leave a Reply