A Free-Market Energy Blog

EPA’s Gold King Whitewash: Part I

By -- September 23, 2015

“EPA and ER had simply ‘miscalculated’ how much water had backed up…. We were ‘very careful.’ The highly acidic, toxic flood was ‘worse aesthetically’ than in reality. Contaminants were ‘flowing too fast to be an immediate health threat.’ … The river is ‘restoring itself’ back to ‘pre-spill conditions’. We just need a ‘focused dialogue’ moving forward.

Can anyone imagine EPA or President Obama making such statements in the wake of a private industry accident? Just recall the hysteria over the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska, Deepwater Horizon (Macondo) blowout in the Gulf of Mexico, PCB contamination in the Hudson and Fox Rivers, Duke Energy coal ash spill in North Carolina, and other accidents.”

Tom Sawyer would be proud. Rarely has there been a finer whitewash than EPA’s with the Gold King Mine disaster. Let’s hope that the whitewash eventually erodes, so that we can get to the truth about Gold King, learn from the disaster, and make better decisions about how to clean up thousands of abandoned mines—while still harvesting the vital raw materials that make modern life possible.

On August 5, as most people now know, an Environmental Restoration (ER) company crew—supervised by officials from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (DRMS)—used a big excavator to dig away tons of collapsed rock and debris (“overburden”) that since 1995 had created a natural dam and blocked the entrance to the Gold King Mine, above Silverton, Colorado.

The mine had been abandoned since 1923, except for a brief period in the late 1980s, and water had been seeping out of the caved-in portal for years. The water was acidic and contained iron, lead, cadmium, mercury, and other heavy metals.

The crew kept digging—until the greatly weakened rock and earth dam burst, unleashing (at least) a 3-million-gallon toxic flash-flood that rapidly contaminated the Animas and San Juan Rivers, all the way to Lake Powell in Utah. To compound the disaster, EPA then waited an entire day before notifying downstream mayors, health officials, families, kayakers, farmers, ranchers, and fishermen that the turmeric-orange water they were drinking, paddling in, or using for crops and livestock was contaminated by heavy metals.

Three million gallons of water and sludge would fill a pool the size of a football field down seven feet (120 x 53.3 x 2.3-yards). As professional geologist Dave Taylor had warned in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper a week before the blowout: Faults, fractures, other mines, topographic features, rainfall, and snowmelt in the area meant water had probably backed up hundreds of feet upward into mine drifts, raises, stopes, rooms, and other passageways that begin at 11,458 feet above sea level. Other experts, who spoke with me on condition of anonymity, had given the EPA and DRMS similar warnings as much as two years earlier.

Water was likely accumulating at the rate of 500 gallons per minute, Taylor said, building a “head pressure” of 1 PSI for every 2.3 feet of vertical rise. That meant a sudden release would send toxic water and sludge flash-flooding with incredible power down nearby creeks and rivers. Which is exactly what it did. Not surprisingly, the official downplaying and whitewashing began almost immediately.

EPA and ER had simply “miscalculated” how much water had backed up. It was just trying to stick a pipe into the top of the mine to safely pump liquid out for treatment. We were “very careful.” The highly acidic, toxic flood was “worse aesthetically” than in reality. Contaminants were “flowing too fast to be an immediate health threat.” Barely a week after the spill, the river is “restoring itself” back to “pre-spill conditions.” We just need a “focused dialogue” moving forward.

Can anyone imagine EPA or President Obama making such statements in the wake of a private industry accident? Just recall the hysteria over the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska, Deepwater Horizon (Macondo) blowout in the Gulf of Mexico, PCB contamination in the Hudson and Fox Rivers, Duke Energy coal ash spill in North Carolina, and other accidents. Those cases drew vicious, long-lasting condemnation:

The affected waters will be polluted for years or even decades. Wildlife will be wiped out. There is no safe threshold for chemicals. They are toxic and carcinogenic at parts per billion. Criminal corporate polluters should be jailed and fined big-time. We will keep our boots on their necks.

Astounding incompetence and negligence

Gold King is an unconscionable disaster that should never have happened. EPA is the government agency that wants to control every puddle of water, every cubic foot of air and carbon dioxide, every car, household, hospital, mall, office building, highway, farm, and factory in America. Its cavalier incompetence and gross negligence in this case are astounding.

Environmental Restoration, the private EPA contractor that caused the toxic flood, had produced a June 2014 work plan for the planned cleanup. Regarding the lack of access to the mine since 1995, when the entrance partially collapsed, the plan warned:

This condition has likely caused impounding of water behind the collapse. In addition, other collapses within the workings may have occurred, creating additional water impounding conditions. Conditions may exist that could result in a blowout of the blockages and cause a release of large volumes of contaminated mine waters and sediment from inside the mine, which contain concentrated heavy metals.

That work plan, Dave Taylor’s letter, and prior experience with the nearby Red & Bonita Mine (discussed later in this article) meant both EPA, DRMS, and ER knew the high risks in advance. And yet they went ahead, with no containment pond to catch runaway water, and no emergency procedures to deal with a blowout and toxic spill. They didn’t even follow their own ill-conceived plan.

(The EPA contingent had actually begun work at Gold King in September 2014 and had removed some 20 feet of “overburden” material that was blocking the entrance. However, it halted the operation when it determined that its analysis of the mine layout was partly in error; it then backfilled the area with crushed rock, compacted the fresh material, and made plans to return in August 2015—which it did. In the process, the team may have blocked two water drainage pipes that had been installed at the floor of the portal.)

During 2015, EPA intended “to remove the blockage [to the mine entrance] and reconstruct the portal at the Gold King Mine, in order to best observe possible changes in discharge caused by the installation of a bulkhead” in the Red & Bonita Mine, the plan says. Despite warnings of a water impoundment, the plan of operations assumed there would be little water in the mine. It reads in part:

      • Use removed material to create manlift access ramp to area above portal….
      • Excavate loose material from the top of the high wall.
      • Hang wire mesh on the high wall as excavation to the sill of the portal proceeds.
      • Excavate to the sill and into the competent rock face at the portal.
      • Gradually lower the debris blockage with the appropriate pumping of the impounded water……

EPA had posted 191 photographs of the area and the crew’s progress—covering the period right up to and for several hours after the flash-flood. These made the agency and contractor negligence very apparent. However, a day after my townhall.com article and link to the photo archive was posted, the entire collection mysteriously disappeared. Most of those pictures and many others relating to the incident and the belated emergency response were finally reposted and can now be seen in this collection and in this one.

None of the photos shows the crew creating a manlift or excavating from the top of the high wall. They make it clear that the crew simply dug and hauled away enormous volumes of overburden, from above the portal downward—until the remaining rock and soil could no longer hold back 3 million gallons of water, and a toxic orange flood roared out of the mine.

(The August 6 long distance photos at 12:51 and 12:53 suggest how much rock and debris had filled in the portal area. The August 4 image at 10:28, with the Caterpillar excavator, shows that extensive overburden had already been removed on the first day. The August 5 photo, at 10:51, clearly shows the portal and extent of excavation; the Cat has already been moved, because the dam has begun giving way. By 10:54 water is flooding out. By 10:56 a real gusher washes away part of the road and at 11:08 a half-submerged Chevy Suburban is adrift in the flash-flood which, as EPA notes in its internal report, lasted nearly an hour. The August 6 close-up at 12:53 shows the portal after the flood had washed the remaining natural dam away.)

Adding insult to the injury and flagrant negligence, a month after the spill, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) told the Navajo Nation  that FMEA would not provide disaster relief – and EPA began removing emergency water tanks it had provided to Navajo ranchers. This was after the first water tanks it provided were still contaminated with oil from a previous operation! But EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy did say she was “absolutely, deeply sorry this happened.”

(Part II tomorrow will examine what should have done by the regulatory parties. Part III will run on Monday September 28th)

54 Comments


  1. Government’s Gold King whitewash | COALBLOG  

    […] I explained in a detailed analysis, experts had warned that contaminated water had probably backed up hundreds of feet upward into the […]

    Reply

  2. Government’s Gold King Whitewash - Capitol Hill Outsider - CHO  

    […] I explained in a detailed analysis, experts had warned that contaminated water had probably backed up hundreds of feet upward into the […]

    Reply

  3. Government’s Gold King Whitewash | Somewhat Reasonable  

    […] I explained in a detailed analysis, experts had warned that contaminated water had probably backed up hundreds of feet upward into the […]

    Reply

  4. Government’s Gold King Whitewash | Western Free Press  

    […] I explained in a detailed analysis, experts had warned that contaminated water had probably backed up hundreds of feet upward into the […]

    Reply

  5. Government’s Gold King Whitewash | PA Pundits - International  

    […] I explained in a detailed analysis, experts had warned that contaminated water had probably backed up hundreds of feet upward into the […]

    Reply

  6. Double standards in the Government’s Gold King mine disaster whitewash | Watts Up With That?  

    […] I explained in a detailed analysis, experts had warned that contaminated water had probably backed up hundreds of feet upward into the […]

    Reply

  7. Needed: Economic Literacy 101  

    […] out of jail free” cards when they deliberately open an abandoned mine and unleash 3,000,000 gallons of toxic sludge. IRS directors simply “take the Fifth” after targeting conservative […]

    Reply

  8. Economic Literacy 101 | PA Pundits - International  

    […] EPA bureaucrats receive get a pass cards when they deliberately open an abandoned mine and unleash 3,000,000 gallons of toxic sludge. IRS directors simply “take the Fifth” after targeting conservatives and […]

    Reply

  9. Game Over: Dark Days Ahead – Economic Literacy 101 – Bank Of America Prepares For BIG LAYOFFS | Reclaim Our Republic  

    […] EPA bureaucrats receive get a pass cards when they deliberately open an abandoned mine and unleash 3,000,000 gallons of toxic sludge. IRS directors simply “take the Fifth” after targeting conservatives and […]

    Reply

  10. Economic Literacy 101 - Capitol Hill Outsider - CHO  

    […] EPA bureaucrats receive get a pass cards when they deliberately open an abandoned mine and unleash 3,000,000 gallons of toxic sludge. IRS directors simply “take the Fifth” after targeting conservatives and […]

    Reply

  11. Do Millennials REALLY Want Socialism? The REAL Answer: – Kstati  

    […] EPA bureaucrats receive get a pass cards when they deliberately open an abandoned mine and unleash 3,000,000 gallons of toxic sludge. IRS directors simply “take the Fifth” after targeting conservatives […]

    Reply

  12. Commentary: Economic Literacy 101  

    […] EPA bureaucrats receive get a pass cards when they deliberately open an abandoned mine and unleash 3,000,000 gallons of toxic sludge. IRS directors simply “take the Fifth” after targeting conservatives and […]

    Reply

  13. Who Is Guarding the (Dictatorial) Guards?  

    […] but only minimal compensation, refused to fire, fine or demote anyone – and issued a report that whitewashed the agency’s incompetence and even scrubbed the names of EPA on-site coordinator Hayes […]

    Reply

  14. Who Is Guarding The (Dictatorial) Guards? | PA Pundits - International  

    […] apologies but only minimal compensation, refused to fire, fine or demote anyone – and issued a report that whitewashed the agency’s incompetence and even scrubbed the names of EPA on-site coordinator Hayes Griswold […]

    Reply

  15. Who is Guarding the (Dictatorial) Guards? - Western Free Press  

    […] but only minimal compensation, refused to fire, fine or demote anyone – and issued a report that whitewashed the agency’s incompetence and even scrubbed the names of EPA on-site coordinator Hayes […]

    Reply

  16. Who Is Guarding the (Dictatorial) Guards?  

    […] apologies but only minimal compensation, refused to fire, fine or demote anyone – and issued a report that whitewashed the agency’s incompetence and even scrubbed the names of EPA on-site coordinator Hayes Griswold […]

    Reply

  17. Refocusing a Chicago Water Summit - Telzilla  

    […] in Colorado, EPA-supervised contractors unleashed a toxic flashflood from the Gold King Mine, contaminating river water for hundreds of miles. EPA waited an entire day before notifying […]

    Reply

  18. Refocusing a Chicago Water Summit  

    […] in Colorado, EPA-supervised contractors unleashed a toxic flashflood from the Gold King Mine, contaminating river water for hundreds of miles. EPA waited an entire day before notifying […]

    Reply

  19. Refocusing a Chicago Water Summit - The Post & Email  

    […] in Colorado, EPA-supervised contractors unleashed a toxic flashflood from the Gold King Mine, contaminating river water for hundreds of miles. EPA waited an entire day before notifying […]

    Reply

  20. Refocusing a Chicago Water Summit – USSA News | The Tea Party's Front Page  

    […] in Colorado, EPA-supervised contractors unleashed a toxic flashflood from the Gold King Mine, contaminating river water for hundreds of miles. EPA waited an entire day before notifying […]

    Reply

  21. Refocusing a Chicago Water Summit – The Trumpiest  

    […] in Colorado, EPA-supervised contractors unleashed a toxic flashflood from the Gold King Mine, contaminating river water for hundreds of miles. EPA waited an entire day before notifying […]

    Reply

  22. “Refocusing a Chicago water summit”: Thinking Globally, Clean Water and Reliable Electricity Make the Planet a Cleaner Place – The Word Merchant  

    […] in Colorado, EPA-supervised contractors unleashed a toxic flashflood from the Gold King Mine, contaminating river water for hundreds of miles. EPA waited an entire day before notifying […]

    Reply

  23. Refocusing a Chicago water summit  

    […] in Colorado, EPA-supervised contractors unleashed a toxic flashflood from the Gold King Mine, contaminating river water for hundreds of miles. The EPA waited an entire day before notifying […]

    Reply

  24. Refocusing a Chicago Water Summit - Capitol Hill Outsider - CHO  

    […] in Colorado, EPA-supervised contractors unleashed a toxic flashflood from the Gold King Mine, contaminating river water for hundreds of miles. EPA waited an entire day before notifying […]

    Reply

  25. Refocusing a Chicago water summit - Self-Educated American  

    […] in Colorado, EPA-supervised contractors unleashed a toxic flashflood from the Gold King Mine, contaminating river water for hundreds of miles. EPA waited an entire day before notifying […]

    Reply

  26. Refocusing a Chicago Water Summit  

    […] in Colorado, EPA-supervised contractors unleashed a toxic flash flood from the Gold King Mine, contaminating river water for hundreds of miles. EPA waited an entire day before notifying […]

    Reply

  27. Refocusing a Chicago Water Summit ~ VIDEO | The Daily Headline News  

    […] in Colorado, EPA-supervised contractors unleashed a toxic flash flood from the Gold King Mine, contaminating river water for hundreds of miles. EPA waited an entire day before notifying […]

    Reply

  28. When Environmentalism Becomes Corruption – Part 1 - The Post & Email  

    […] 2015. The historic San Juan Mining District experienced an even greater disaster: the infamous 2015 Gold King Mine Spill, whose direct cause can be laid squarely on the DRMS, in conjunction with the U.S. Environmental […]

    Reply

  29. When environmentalism becomes corruption – Part 1 | Watts Up With That?  

    […] 2015. The historic San Juan Mining District experienced an even greater disaster: the infamous 2015 Gold King Mine Spill, whose direct cause can be laid squarely on the DRMS, in conjunction with the U.S. Environmental […]

    Reply

  30. When environmentalism becomes corruption – Part 1 - Eco-Imperialism  

    […] The historic San Juan Mining District experienced an even greater disaster: the infamous 2015 Gold King Mine Spill, whose direct cause can be laid squarely on the DRMS, in conjunction with the U.S. Environmental […]

    Reply

  31. Government (-driven) Shutdowns Have Human Consequences | THAT'S WHAT I'M SCREAMING  

    […] officials were also in charge of the bungled operation that unleashed a toxic flashflood from Colorado’s Gold King Mine in 2015. EPA and its media allies quickly whitewashed the […]

    Reply

  32. Government (-driven) Shutdowns Have Human Consequences - The Post & Email  

    […] officials were also in charge of the bungled operation that unleashed a toxic flashflood from Colorado’s Gold King Mine in 2015. EPA and its media allies quickly whitewashed the […]

    Reply

  33. Government (-driven) Shutdowns Have Human Consequences | peoples trust toronto  

    […] officials were also in charge of the bungled operation that unleashed a toxic flashflood from Colorado’s Gold King Mine in 2015. EPA and its media allies quickly whitewashed the […]

    Reply

  34. Government (-driven) shutdowns have human consequences - NoPaperNews  

    […] officials were also in charge of the bungled operation that unleashed a toxic flashflood from Colorado’s Gold King Mine in 2015. EPA and its media allies quickly whitewashed the […]

    Reply

  35. Government (-driven) shutdowns have human consequences | Watts Up With That?  

    […] officials were also in charge of the bungled operation that unleashed a toxic flashflood from Colorado’s Gold King Mine in 2015. EPA and its media allies quickly whitewashed the […]

    Reply

  36. Government (-driven) shutdowns have human consequences – The Northwest Connection  

    […] officials were also in charge of the bungled operation that unleashed a toxic flashflood from Colorado’s Gold King Mine in 2015. EPA and its media allies quickly whitewashed the […]

    Reply

  37. Government (-driven) shutdowns have human consequences - Eco-Imperialism  

    […] officials were also in charge of the bungled operation that unleashed a toxic flashflood from Colorado’s Gold King Mine in 2015. EPA and its media allies quickly whitewashed the […]

    Reply

  38. TownHall Columnists: Remembering EPA's Gold King Mine Blowout - Part 2 - wlvrns!  

    […] August 5, five years to the day after suffering from a 3-million-gallon spill of heavy-metal-laden toxic wastewater from Colorado’s Gold King Mine, the State of Utah […]

    Reply

  39. Recalling EPA’s Gold King Mine disaster – Part 1    - The Post & Email  

    […] in-depth September 2015 MasterResource.org articles (here, here and here) provide extensive details – and damning conclusions – about the scope of EPA […]

    Reply

  40. Recalling EPA’s Gold King Mine disaster – Part 1 - SELF-EDUCATED AMERICAN  

    […] in-depth September 2015 MasterResource.org articles (here, here and here) provide extensive details – and damning conclusions – about the scope of EPA […]

    Reply

  41. Recalling EPA’s Gold King Mine disaster – Part 1 | Watts Up With That?  

    […] in-depth September 2015 MasterResource.org articles (here, here and here) provide extensive details – and damning conclusions – about the scope of EPA […]

    Reply

  42. Recalling EPA’s Gold King Mine disaster – Part 1 |  

    […] in-depth September 2015 MasterResource.org articles (here, here and here) provide extensive details – and damning conclusions – about the scope […]

    Reply

  43. Revisiting EPA’s Gold King Mine blowout – Part 2 - SELF-EDUCATED AMERICAN  

    […] August 5, five years to the day after suffering from a 3-million-gallon spill of heavy-metal-laden toxic wastewater from Colorado’s Gold King Mine, the State of Utah announced […]

    Reply

  44. Revisiting EPA’s Gold King Mine blowout – Part 2    - The Post & Email  

    […] 7, 2020) — On August 5, five years to the day after suffering from a 3-million-gallon spill of heavy-metal-laden toxic wastewater from Colorado’s Gold King Mine, the State of Utah announced […]

    Reply

  45. 1. US Security from Michael_Novakhov (87 sites): Eurasia Review: Revisiting EPA's Gold King Mine Blowout (Part II) – OpEd | News Links - news-links.org  

    […] August 5, five years to the day after suffering from a 3-million-gallon spill of heavy-metal-laden toxic wastewater from Colorado’s Gold King Mine, the State of Utah […]

    Reply

  46. 1. US Security from Michael_Novakhov (87 sites): Eurasia Review: Revisiting EPA's Gold King Mine Blowout (Part II) – OpEd | Global Security Review  

    […] August 5, five years to the day after suffering from a 3-million-gallon spill of heavy-metal-laden toxic wastewater from Colorado’s Gold King Mine, the State of Utah […]

    Reply

  47. 1. US Security from Michael_Novakhov (87 sites): Eurasia Review: Revisiting EPA's Gold King Mine Blowout (Part II) – OpEd | Global Security News - globalsecuritynews.org  

    […] August 5, five years to the day after suffering from a 3-million-gallon spill of heavy-metal-laden toxic wastewater from Colorado’s Gold King Mine, the State of Utah […]

    Reply

  48. Revisiting EPA’s Gold King Mine blowout – Part 2 | Watts Up With That?  

    […] August 5, five years to the day after suffering from a 3-million-gallon spill of heavy-metal-laden toxic wastewater from Colorado’s Gold King Mine, the State of Utah announced […]

    Reply

  49. Counterintelligence from Michael_Novakhov (51 sites): Eurasia Review: Revisiting EPA's Gold King Mine Blowout (Part II) – OpEd | Trump and FBI - trumpandfbi.com  

    […] August 5, five years to the day after suffering from a 3-million-gallon spill of heavy-metal-laden toxic wastewater from Colorado’s Gold King Mine, the State of Utah […]

    Reply

  50. Trump and FBI – News Review from Michael_Novakhov (10 sites): Counterintelligence from Michael_Novakhov (51 sites): Eurasia Review: Revisiting EPA's Gold King Mine Blowout (Part II) – OpEd | Trump News - The News and Times  

    […] August 5, five years to the day after suffering from a 3-million-gallon spill of heavy-metal-laden toxic wastewater from Colorado’s Gold King Mine, the State of Utah […]

    Reply

  51. Trump and FBI – News Review from Michael_Novakhov (10 sites): Counterintelligence from Michael_Novakhov (51 sites): Eurasia Review: Revisiting EPA's Gold King Mine Blowout (Part II) – OpEd | All News And Times - all-nt.com  

    […] August 5, five years to the day after suffering from a 3-million-gallon spill of heavy-metal-laden toxic wastewater from Colorado’s Gold King Mine, the State of Utah […]

    Reply

  52. Revisiting EPA’s Gold King Mine blowout – Part 2 |  

    […] August 5, five years to the day after suffering from a 3-million-gallon spill of heavy-metal-laden toxic wastewater from Colorado’s Gold King Mine, the State of Utah […]

    Reply

  53. Revisiting EPA's Gold King Mine blowout – Part 2Climate- Science.press | Climate- Science.press  

    […] August 5, five years to the day after suffering from a 3-million-gallon spill of heavy-metal-laden toxic wastewater from Colorado’s Gold King Mine, the State of Utah […]

    Reply

  54. Opinion: Recalling EPA’s Gold King Mine Disaster – Part 1 – The Northwest Connection  

    […] in-depth September 2015 MasterResource.org articles (here, here and here) provide extensive details – and damning conclusions – about the scope of EPA […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply