‘Oil, Gas & Government: The U.S. Experience’ (outline presentation of my treatise)
By Robert Bradley Jr. -- May 2, 2019
Back in 1996, the Cato Institute published the above two-volume treatise. Oil, Gas, and Government was the first (and still only) classical-liberal history of intervention in a major U.S. industry. I subsequently lectured on the book at Cato in Washington, DC and at a few other locals.
I recently ran across the outline/major points of my presentation, which I share below for those interested in the historical sweep of oil and gas regulation, tax policy, government ownership, and public grants.
To understand the perils of interventionism (particularly price controls and wartime planning), I document the coordination and problem solving in exploration/production, transmission/transportation, refining, and distribution/marketing. (Electricity, a separate energy industry, was not covered in the book.)
“Government Intervention in U.S. Oil and Gas Markets: Searching for ‘Market Failure’” (Synopsis of Major Themes of Oil, Gas, and Government: The U.S. Experience) April, 1996
An Old-Style Treatise
- Covers all Important Historical Episodes from Inception to the mid-1980s
- Incorporates Opposing Viewpoints
- 1,997 pages — 6,601 footnotes — 15,000+ citations
- Three Indexes (name, subject, legal cases)
- Extensively Cross-Referenced
Organization of the Book
- Theory (39 pages)
- Historical Section
Chronologically Ordered by Industry Phase (upstream to downstream)
- Exploration and Production (534 pages)
- Transportation and Allocation (466 pages)
- Refining (216 pages)
- Retailing (475 pages)
- Economic Conclusions (52 pages); Political Conclusions (55 pages)
- Public Policy (37 pages)
Why Is The Book So Lengthy?
- More Than a Century of Experience
- Not One but Many Industries
- Oil and Gas Heavily Regulated on all Governmental Levels
- Oil & Gas Inspired Major Non-Specific Regulation Covered in the Book
- Not Only a Book on Government Intervention but Market Developments
A Treatise on Government
Intervention, Not Just Oil and Gas
- Antitrust Law
- Corporate Taxation
- Government Road Building and
Finance
- Accounting and Securities
Regulation
- Futures Regulation
- Air and Water Emission
Regulation
- Railroad, Waterway, and
Trucking Regulation and Subsidization
- Labor and Safety Regulation
Distinguishing
Characteristics of the Book
- Market-Process Economic Theory (“Austrian School” of Economics)
- Public Choice School of Economics/Revisionist History
- Homestead Private Property Rights Framework
- Economies of Scale/Scope
Major Themes
of the Book
“There are as many objections as there are differing economic interests.” – State of Louisiana v. FPC, 503 F. d 844 at 869 (1974)
“One interference with competition necessitates another and yet another, and an industry of ‘rugged individualists’ becomes more and more tightly enmeshed with the government to which they originally turned in hope of protecting themselves from competition.” Alfred Kahn, The Economics of Regulation, 2 vols.(New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1971), vol. 2, p. 29
Five Controversial Episodes (“Market Failures”) in the U.S. Oil and Gas Experience
- “Natural Monopoly” of
Manufactured Gas Distribution (and electric distribution)
- “Predatory Pricing” of the
Standard Oil Trust
- Wartime or Emergency
Planning
- Overdrilling/Overproduction
Under the “Rule of Capture” (depletion
of nonrenewable resources)
- U.S. Regulation to Mitigate
OPEC/Energy Security
“Natural Monopoly” of
Manufactured Gas Distribution
- Free Market Era
- Turn to Public Utility Regulation
- Plugging “Regulatory Gaps”
- Established Utility Viewpoint Becomes the “Textbook” View
- Manufactured Gas: Political Origins Similar to Electricity, Interstate Railroads, etc.
- Revisionist Viewpoint: Can
Momentum Turn into Pluralism or Even Consensus?
“Predatory
Pricing” and the Standard Oil Trust
- The “Textbook” View: From
Ida Tarbell to Daniel Yergin
- The Economic Verdict: Price,
Quantity, and Safety/Reliability
- The Folklore Examined: John
McGee’s “Predatory Price Cutting: The
Standard Oil (N.J.) Case”
- Standard’s Business Ethics
Reconsidered
Wartime or Emergency Planning
- Supply (Initial Government Intervention) Creates its Own Demand (More Government Intervention)
- The Importance of Entrepreneurship and the “Market Discovery Process” in Normal and Abnormal Times
- Government as Resource Procurer (taxing; spending)
Overdrilling/Overproduction Under the “Rule of Capture” (Depletion of Nonrenewable Resources)
- Textbook View: The
Transaction Cost Problem and Government Solution
- Free Market Response:
- Alternative Private Property Rights Allocation (“homestead” theory)
- An Inherent Knowledge Problem
- “Government Failure” and Noncooperation
- Antitrust Law
- Tax Incentives
- Conservation Law Incentives
- Public Lands Problem
- Field Shutdowns (over asset reallocation)
- Offset Drilling Rule
- Common Carrier/Common Purchaser Requirement
OPEC and
Energy Security
- Protecting U.S. Consumers
from World Oil Price Increases
- The Breakdown of the Grand
Regulatory Regime
- Import Prices (entitlements
program)
- Wellhead Price Decontrol
Categories
- Oil Resellers: Villains or
Heroes?
- Along with Natural Gas
Shortages, Oil Shortages Have Made the Price and Allocation Regulation Paradigm
Lose Credibility
- Has the World Petroleum Market Made “Energy Security” Obsolete?
Alleged “Market Failures” Today
- Energy Security (DOE)
- “A Brewing Energy R&D Crisis” (DOE)
- Energy Environmentalism (PUC/DOE)
- Public Utility Regulation (gas and electric)
- “The Natural Gas Market is not Working” (Plank) to “Natural Gas Prices Are Too Low” (Wyatt)
Conclusions
- The History of Market Forces in the Oil and Gas Industry Has Been the History of Technological Change Creating New Market Orders and Business Distress to the Nonadaptive “Old Guard”
- The History of Government
Intervention is the History of Turning “Buyer’s Markets” into “Sellers’ Markets”
With Oil and Gas
- On Close Inspection, There
is Much More “Analytical Failure” and “Government Failure” Than “Market Failure”
With Oil and Gas
- Far Too Much of Our
Historical Perspective Has Been Through the Eyes of the Less Efficient “Old
Guard,” Not Consumer Welfare
- Historical Analysis Is Much
Richer With the Insights of Market-Process Economics (General Effects Instead
of “The Seen”) and Public Choice Economics/Revisionist History (“Who Benefited,
Who Caused?”)
- We Not Only Need to Rewrite Important
Segments of the “Official History” but Apply a Higher Analytical Standard in
the Future to Better Understand the Market Order and the Unintended
Consequences of Government Intervention
This lengthy treatise is out of print–but available at a hefty price with booksellers (Amazon here). A study guide to the individual chapters is in preparation by the esteemed Robert Murphy.
I am currently exploring the opportunity of having the book republished on its 25th anniversary in 2021 with minor errors corrected and a new retrospective introduction. It is my hope that this big book/treatise approach can inspire similar efforts in other U.S. industries to better understand the process of interventionism (reformer- and/or business-led) to better inform public policy.
Stay tuned.