A Free-Market Energy Blog

The Global Warming ‘Pause’: What Alarmists Said Back in 2009

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- March 23, 2016

“Pauses as long as 15 years are rare in the simulations, and ‘we expect that [real-world] warming will resume in the next few years,’ the Hadley Centre group writes…. Researchers … agree that no sort of natural variability can hold off greenhouse warming much longer.”

– Richard Kerr. What Happened to Global Warming? Scientists Say Just Wait a Bit.”  Science, October 1, 2009.

Debates over the ‘pause’ or ‘hiatus’ of global warming since its El Nino-driven peak back in 1998 should not forget the false confidence of leading alarmist scientists were saying less than a decade ago about how the warming slowdown was surely coming to an end. After all, model-predicted warming was the best indication of reality if the models had the right physics in them (a Big if).…

Continue Reading

‘Grid Parity’ for Renewables: Why Subsidies? (Part II)

By Mark Febrizio -- March 22, 2016

“By focusing strictly on cost-competitiveness, grid parity fails to consider how dispatchability influences an energy source’s value on the grid. Moreover, renewable energy sources rely heavily on government funding to even reach cost-competitiveness. Continued subsidization of solar and wind to make them cost-competitive or accelerate their adoption is unjustified. “

As Part I of this analysis explained, grid parity for renewable energy is an empty concept because it fails to consider the functionality of renewable resources on the electric grid. Since grid operators must balance supply and demand to sustain grid stability and meet the power needs of Americans, dispatchable resources are extraordinarily valuable for electricity generation.

Resources such as coal, natural gas, nuclear, and hydropower can dispatch power on demand, but solar and wind energy are intermittent, making them undependable for electricity generation.

Continue Reading

‘Grid Parity’ for Renewables: An Empty Concept (Part I)

By Mark Febrizio -- March 21, 2016

“Coal, natural gas, nuclear, and hydroelectric power are essential because they are predictable and dispatchable resources; conversely, renewables produce power intermittently and are less valuable as a generation resource…. To reach true grid parity, an energy source should be able to produce affordable electricity as well as dependably meet electricity demand.”

The idea of cost-competitiveness for renewable energy resources—called “grid parity”—is misleading and incomplete without considering reliability. Yet recent reports are pushing grid parity as an imminent reality. For example, a February 2016 study from GTM Research assessed that electricity from residential solar has attained grid parity in 20 states.

How an electricity source functions on the grid is more important than mere cost-competitiveness. To reach true grid parity, an electricity source should provide affordable, reliable power on a dependable basis.…

Continue Reading

Human Achievement Hour (Earth Hour made happy!)

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- March 18, 2016
Continue Reading

Smil on Oily Wind Turbines

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- March 17, 2016
Continue Reading

Ethanol’s Lost Decades: Could We Have Had a Biofuel World?

By Marc Rauch -- March 16, 2016
Continue Reading

“Denier” Charge from Jerry Taylor: How Low Can He Go?

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- March 15, 2016
Continue Reading

Energy Warring in Canada: Free Market Capitalism, Anyone?

By Dave Harbour -- March 14, 2016
Continue Reading

EPA’s Methane Rule: All Burden for No Climate Benefit

By Steve Everley -- March 11, 2016
Continue Reading

“Grid-Enabled” Water Heating: “Deep Decarbonization” as Crony Environmentalism (Part II)

By -- March 10, 2016
Continue Reading