Search Results for: "Deep Decarbonization"
Relevance | DateEnergy Appliance Victory! (DC Circuit vs. DOE)
By Mark Krebs -- July 10, 2023 11 Comments“The ‘wheels of justice turn slowly,’ but they indeed turned, even within the District of Columbia’s ‘uni-party.’ As for holding on to this victory, it is far from a slam-dunk for preserving consumer choice and free markets. I expect the struggle to escalate in Biden’s all-of-government war against natural gas and other fossil fuels.”
Beleaguered energy consumers were just handed a far-reaching victory by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (DC Circuit). The ruling vacated a Final Rule from the U.S, Department of Energy (DOE) that would have banned the manufacture and sale of non-condensing boilers for use in commercial applications. DOE’s rule was challenged several years ago by natural gas interests–and later joined with a separate but similar case brought by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI).…
Continue ReadingElectrified Compressors and the Great Texas Blackout (a threat to grid reliability everywhere)
By Ed Ireland -- May 4, 2023 3 CommentsEd Note: “Electric natural gas compressors contributed to the near collapse of the Texas power grid in 2021,” Ed Ireland argues below. “All U.S. power grids face the same risk.” His first-hand knowledge of this instance of ‘deep decarbonization’ politics gets to the why-behind-the-why of the still-debated Texas blackout, the worst electricity debacle in the history of the industry.
… Continue Reading“The anti-fossil fuel movement started pressuring North Texas cities and towns to require electric compressors on natural gas pipelines based on arguments that the air pollution from natural gas-powered compressors was causing increased asthma and other health problems…. I said that electrifying natural gas pipeline compressors was a terrible idea that could affect the availability of natural gas when it was needed most, such as during bad weather events. Unfortunately, I lost that debate….”
DOE vs. Gas Cooking: A Review of Critical Comments
By Mark Krebs -- April 27, 2023 1 CommentThe filed comments exceeded expectations. The free-market commenters were especially prevalent and displayed great content. Some trade associations also deserve special recognition.
Biden’s “whole of government” Department of Justice is becoming far less likely to challenge DOE on matters of fuel neutrality.
Good news! Filed comments opposing the U.S. Department of Energy’s “Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Conventional Cooking Products (Ovens)” beat the other side in quantity, quality and range. The sheer volume of opposition comments makes a summary difficult, as does the new format of the regulations.gov website (requiring each numbered comment be opened one-by-one to identify the sender’s identity). There are 2,650 comments in this docket, dating back to Feb 24, 2014. [1]
The following table is provided to give examples of some of the more thorough yet diverse comments opposing adoption filed in the last few days before the comment period closed on April 17th:
Submitter Info | Comment ID |
Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI)[i] | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2287 |
ONE Gas (utility company) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2289 |
National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2288 |
National Propane Gas Association (NPGA) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2270 |
Heritage Foundation | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2281 |
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-0071 |
Institute for Energy Research (IER) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2274 |
American Public Gas Association (APGA) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2283 |
American Gas Association (AGA) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-0007 |
CO2 Coalition (Happer Lindzen Wrightstone) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2275 |
Joint States Attorneys General (1 of 2) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2277 |
Joint States Attorneys General (2 of 2) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2264 |
Review of Comments
The filed comments exceeded expectations. The…
Continue ReadingGeoengineering: New Area for the Climate Industrial Complex?
By Robert Bradley Jr. -- February 28, 2023 3 Comments“There are substantial environmental, technical, and cost challenges in using carbon dioxide removal (CDR) at the scale needed to significantly reduce global warming…. [that make it] unlikely that CDR could be implemented rapidly enough or at sufficient scale to entirely avoid dangerous levels of climate warming in the near term.” (Pro, public letter, February 27, 2023)
“The speculative possibility of future solar geoengineering risks becoming a powerful argument for industry lobbyists, climate denialists, and some governments to delay decarbonization policies.” (Con, open letter: January 17, 2022)
It is hard, contradictory, and hypocritical to be “green” as conventionally defined. I am reminded of a comment in the 1970s that noted “a general frustration generated by the energy crisis: every solution to the problem seems to create tremendous problems of its own.”…
Continue Reading