A Free-Market Energy Blog

Federal Oil Lands Lockdown: Disingenuous Obama at Work

By -- January 24, 2014

“The President has bragged that ‘we produce more oil at home than we have in 15 years.’ Indeed domestic production rose from 5.6 to 6.4 million daily barrels in 2012 from the year before (12.5%). However, production from federal onshore and offshore areas has fallen significantly under his watch – and 96% of the above production increase was on state and private lands.”

President Obama insists he is determined to create jobs in America. He recently announced the creation of “promise zones” for five communities around the nation and a “manufacturing institute” aimed at fostering more high-paying jobs in energy efficiency.

He’s also said he has “a pen and a phone” to “sign executive orders and take executive actions that move the ball,” where Congress has failed to implement policies he believes are needed.

Continue Reading

The Ethanol Mandate: Don’t Tweak, Abolish (a costly fuel without a public purpose)

By James M. Griffin -- January 23, 2014

[Editor note: This post is taken from a new policy brief, The Latest Unanticipated Consequence in the Ethanol Fiasco, released by the Mosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics, and Public Policy at Texas A&M University. Professor Griffin, who directs the Mosbacher Institute, is also author of U.S. Ethanol Policy: Time to Reconsider? in The Energy Journal (Fall 2013).]

Executive Summary

  1. The 2007 mandates to steadily increase ethanol content in gasoline have hit yet another roadblock.
  2. Falling — instead of rising — gasoline consumption means that fuel blenders can no longer absorb the mandated ethanol quantities and still produce gasoline with no more than 10% ethanol content.
  3. Auto manufacturers strongly object to raising the ethanol content above 10%.
  4. Now, the EPA has proposed a one-time, one year waiver relaxing the 2014 mandate.
Continue Reading

Energy Tax Reform: Scrap the Baucus Proposal (Part IV: Negative Wealth Effects)

By Glenn Schleede -- January 22, 2014

[Editor note: This is the final excerpt of a January 15 letter by Mr. Schleede to the Senate Finance Committee concerning the Baucus tax-reform proposal (December 18, 2013). Part I reprinted the executive summary and conclusions; Part II the high cost/low value of windpower. Part III the negative environmental effects of continued subsidization of windpower, including the “cleanliness” standard of the Baucus proposal.]

“Tax breaks and subsidies for wind transfer wealth from ordinary taxpayers and electric customers to “wind farm” owners, electric customers in some states, and the voluntary purchasers of high cost electricity from wind.”

During the past 20 years, a variety of tax breaks and special subsidies for the wind industry have had massive wealth transfer impacts. The proposed production tax credit (PTC) and investment tax credit (ITC) would extend such impact for years into the future.

Continue Reading

Energy Tax Reform: Scrap the Baucus Proposal (Part III: Environmental Issues)

By Glenn Schleede -- January 21, 2014
Continue Reading

AWED Energy & Environmental Newsletter: January 20, 2014

By -- January 20, 2014
Continue Reading

Energy Tax Reform: Scrap the Baucus Proposal (Part II: High cost/low value of windpower)

By Glenn Schleede -- January 17, 2014
Continue Reading

Energy Tax Reform: Scrap the Baucus Proposal (Part I: Summary & Conclusions)

By Glenn Schleede -- January 16, 2014
Continue Reading

‘Climate Change’: Unpacking a Political Term (looking through the looking glass)

By -- January 15, 2014
Continue Reading

Richard Kerr (Science) in 2009: Warming ‘Pause’ About to Be Replaced by ‘Jolt’

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- January 14, 2014
Continue Reading

$5.4 Billion in Solar: California Goes All In

By Jerry Graf -- January 13, 2014
Continue Reading