A Free-Market Energy Blog

Global Warming is Responsible for ….

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- July 16, 2013

“When the history of the global warming scare comes to be written, a chapter should be devoted to the way the message had to be altered to keep the show on the road. Global warming became climate change so as to be able to take the blame for cold spells and wet seasons as well as hot days. Then, to keep its options open, the movement began to talk about ‘extreme weather’.”

– Matt Ridley,Nobody Even Calls the Weather Average,” July 9, 2013.

There is no link between global warming and Sharknado, tweats U.S. EPA. But this summer, global warming has been blamed for firefighter deaths, more thunderstorms, and poor lobster catches. The litany of abnormalities that is so big and broad that contradictions, not only prima facie absurdities, abound.

Continue Reading

AWED Newsletter: July 15, 2013

By -- July 15, 2013

The Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions (AWED) is an informal coalition of individuals and organizations interested in improving national, state, and local energy & environmental policies. Our basic position is that technical matters like these should be addressed by using real science.

Instead of a science-based approach, our energy and environmental policies are typically written by those who stand to economically or politically profit from them. As a result, anything genuinely science-based in these policies is usually inadvertent and accidental.

A key element of AWED’s efforts is public education. Towards that end, every 3 weeks we put together a newsletter to balance what is found in the mainstream media about energy and environmental matters. We appreciate MasterResource for their assistance in publishing this information.

—————————

More reports about greed energy economics:

It’s Time To Sequester Green Energy Subsidies, Not Mythical Oil And Gas Tax Breaks

End Subsidies for Wind Energy?

Continue Reading

Other Arguments Against Environmental Commodification (Part IV)

By Sterling Burnett -- July 14, 2013

“Where ecological services need to be monetized, they likely will be. Where monetization is unlikely or virtually impossible, they probably don’t need to be brought into the cost benefit calculations of decision makers in the normal course of events. And attempting to do so might be viewed with suspicion and undermine support for the very environmental benefit one is attempting to foster.”

Defining ecosystems in general or a specific ecosystem in particular is a difficult endeavor.

As daunting a task as this is, it is no less difficult to establish a sound economic baseline for the entirety of the benefits that nature provides to mankind. Where ecological services need to be monetized, they likely will be. Where monetization is unlikely or virtually impossible, they probably don’t need to be brought into the cost benefit calculations of decision makers in the normal course of events.

Continue Reading

Economists vs. Ecosystem Commodification (Part III)

By Sterling Burnett -- July 13, 2013
Continue Reading

Environmentalists Question Commodification (Part II)

By Sterling Burnett -- July 12, 2013
Continue Reading

Pricing (Nonmarket) Ecosystem Services: The Dream (Part I)

By Sterling Burnett -- July 11, 2013
Continue Reading

Coal As An Environmental Product (Part II)

By Mary Hutzler -- July 10, 2013
Continue Reading

U.S. Coal: Vast, Market Ready (Part I)

By Mary Hutzler -- July 9, 2013
Continue Reading

Reclaiming the Moral High Ground (Epstein’s new energy primer)

By Pierre Desrochers -- July 8, 2013
Continue Reading

Windaction News Issue: July 6, 2013

By -- July 6, 2013
Continue Reading