Search Results for: "deep decarbonization"
Relevance | DateDOE vs. Gas Cooking: A Review of Critical Comments
By Mark Krebs -- April 27, 2023 1 CommentThe filed comments exceeded expectations. The free-market commenters were especially prevalent and displayed great content. Some trade associations also deserve special recognition.
Biden’s “whole of government” Department of Justice is becoming far less likely to challenge DOE on matters of fuel neutrality.
Good news! Filed comments opposing the U.S. Department of Energy’s “Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Conventional Cooking Products (Ovens)” beat the other side in quantity, quality and range. The sheer volume of opposition comments makes a summary difficult, as does the new format of the regulations.gov website (requiring each numbered comment be opened one-by-one to identify the sender’s identity). There are 2,650 comments in this docket, dating back to Feb 24, 2014. [1]
The following table is provided to give examples of some of the more thorough yet diverse comments opposing adoption filed in the last few days before the comment period closed on April 17th:
Submitter Info | Comment ID |
Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI)[i] | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2287 |
ONE Gas (utility company) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2289 |
National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2288 |
National Propane Gas Association (NPGA) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2270 |
Heritage Foundation | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2281 |
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-0071 |
Institute for Energy Research (IER) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2274 |
American Public Gas Association (APGA) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2283 |
American Gas Association (AGA) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-0007 |
CO2 Coalition (Happer Lindzen Wrightstone) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2275 |
Joint States Attorneys General (1 of 2) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2277 |
Joint States Attorneys General (2 of 2) | EERE-2014-BT-STD-0005-2264 |
Review of Comments
The filed comments exceeded expectations. The…
Continue ReadingGeoengineering: New Area for the Climate Industrial Complex?
By Robert Bradley Jr. -- February 28, 2023 3 Comments“There are substantial environmental, technical, and cost challenges in using carbon dioxide removal (CDR) at the scale needed to significantly reduce global warming…. [that make it] unlikely that CDR could be implemented rapidly enough or at sufficient scale to entirely avoid dangerous levels of climate warming in the near term.” (Pro, public letter, February 27, 2023)
“The speculative possibility of future solar geoengineering risks becoming a powerful argument for industry lobbyists, climate denialists, and some governments to delay decarbonization policies.” (Con, open letter: January 17, 2022)
It is hard, contradictory, and hypocritical to be “green” as conventionally defined. I am reminded of a comment in the 1970s that noted “a general frustration generated by the energy crisis: every solution to the problem seems to create tremendous problems of its own.”…
Continue ReadingGas Stoves: The Beloved Blue Flame is Just Better
By Mark Krebs and Tom Tanton -- February 14, 2023 9 Comments“Forcibly moving the market via equipment costs is a typical DOE strategy. And then they say, ‘let the market decide’.”
On January 30, 2023, National Public Radio (NPR) published an episode, How Worried Should You Be About Your Gas Stove? On February 4, NPR released a follow up: Gas stove makers have a pollution solution. They’re just not using it. Listen to both audio clips.
NPR’s advocates are part of a choir trying to justify ending natural gas combustion, starting with gas stoves. They are just as purposefully misleading as the rest of the choir.
Policy Concern
The concern should not be about gas stove usage but the public policy of The Biden Administrative State to wean consumers off the direct use of natural gas and propane and on to electric appliances, ASAP. …
Continue Reading