“If you want to continue to be frustrated with a failing worldview, stay in your present state of denial. If you want to better understand reality and be happier, a different worldview based on sound intellectual premises and comporting to the real world awaits. The choice is yours.”

In a recent piece in DRILLED, climate activist Amy Westervelt asked: “Why is Fairness Being Ceded to the Fossil Fuel Industry?” The simple answer is the physical fact of energy density and the verdict of billions of us all day, every day, resulting in a global market share of fossil fuels of 82 percent. (And that percentage should be 90 percent or so if government was energy-neutral.)

Ms. Westervelt should read Vaclav Smil to understand what energy density is (the sun’s work over the ages); why it drives energy markets (superior economics); and why renewables are worse for the environment (land and other infrastructure bloat).…

Ed. Note: This post excerpts energy and climate material from the Media Balance Newsletter, a free fortnighly published by physicist John Droz Jr., founder of the Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions. The complete Newsletter for this post can be found here.

Greed Energy Economics:
*** There Is A Financial Crisis Brewing In Offshore Wind Energy
Dominion hides huge offshore wind cost risk
Unlikely Pair Tries to Blow Open Secret NY Wind Deal 

Unreliables: Energy Health and Ecosystem Consequences:
*** One Simple Energy Question Devastates ‘Net-Zero’ Pipe Dreams
Human Rights Being Sacrificed to Promote Green Energy Scams

Unreliables (General):
*** The Big Green Lie Almost Everyone Claims to Believe
*** Massive Riots, Renewable Resentments
*** The Problem with Overbuilding Wind and Solar
*** The Power Of Power Density
Think megawatt hours of gasoline

Wind Energy — Offshore:
*** Offshore Wind Lulls Threaten NY Energy Reliability
*** Fishermen question the data behind offshore wind siting process
*** Why Offshore Wind Jobs May Just Be a Lot of Hot Air
*** Save the Whales, Again
BP and Equinor Could Cancel US Offshore Wind Projects
Offshore Wind Opponents need a Mass Protest in DC

Wind Energy — Other:
*** Taking the Wind Out of Climate Change (referencing 60± studies)
*** State Senator introduces bill requiring wind turbine installations in NYC
Siemens Faces $5 Billion Loss On Faulty Wind Turbines
Massachusetts 50 Years of Wind Turbine Failures

Solar Energy:
*** Solar Realities (updated)
New analysis tears down lies about renewables, reveals solar panels to be carbon-intensive
Let Them Eat Solar Panels

Nuclear Energy:
*** China Approves Six Nuclear Reactors at $17 Billion Investment
*** Vivek Ramaswamy: Shut Down the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
God and Nuclear Energy

Fossil Fuel Energy:
*** Eliminating Fossil Fuels Will Cause Massive Decline In Human Well-Being
*** Biden admin quietly revises gas stove analysis, reduces projected benefits
Three Cheers for Refrigeration—and Four, Once Everyone Has It
North Sea oil and gas fields tax credits are not subsidies

Electric Vehicles (EVs):
*** Electrogreens Want to Suck Your EV
*** Control is the Aim, EVs are the Game of the Moment
*** Spontaneous Combustion: A Serious Product Defect
They’re Coming for Your Cars
China ‘will use electric cars to spy on Britain’

Miscellaneous Energy News:
*** How to powerfully and accurately criticize the Biden Admin’s energy policies
*** Biden’s new crackdown on Air Conditioners will be worse than gas stoves
*** The EPA Tries to Destroy the Grid
The US Electrical Grid: Achilles Heel of the World?…

“UKers have been hearing doom for a half century. Citizens want affordable, reliable energy. Many if not most know that UK sacrifice will not have any affect on climate for decades given the global coal, gas, and oil boom. Adaptation yes, but don’t exaggerate.”

It began with a “Wake Up Rishi Sunak” post from Andrew Griffiths, director of Policy & Partnerships at PlanetMark, a climate activist organization that continually complains that the UK government never does enough to mitigate greenhouse gases. Never mind that the UK accounts for about one percent of such global emissions; its oil and gas industry is mostly shut down; businesses can’t afford climate-policy-inflated bills, and consumers are falling into energy poverty…. And the plants like CO2!

“When government actually tell the general public what the climate crisis will mean for the UK, they demand government action,” Andrew begins.…

“Interestingly, none other than Michael Mann disagreed with Hansen’s climate acceleration hypothesis. Is it because Mann et al. know that doomerism is a political loser? Climate science is so political and PR-driven it is hard to know.

Recently in the Guardian, James Hansen unloaded on the complacent public for giving the world the current heat wave. How interesting, coming 35 years after he went alarmist to inspire exaggerated and falsified predictions of future temperature and sea-level-rise. And today, even alarmist scientists are pushing back on Hansen’s dire prediction of heating acceleration.

Here is another data point on the outlier Hansen. In 2006, he gave this ultimatum:

We have at most ten years—not ten years to decide upon action, but ten years to alter fundamentally the trajectory of global greenhouse emissions.