A Free-Market Energy Blog

The End of a Peak Oil Theorist: Matt Simmons in Retrospect (Part II)

By -- February 10, 2011

[This is the second part of a series on peak-oil theorist and neo-Malthusian, the late Matthew Simmons (1943–2010). Yesterday, Robert Bradley examined the Simmons’s peculiar interpretation of the Club of Rome’s 1972 Limits to Growth.

Part III will look at Simmons’s failed bet with different parties that the average price of oil in 2010 would be $200 per barrel or higher.]

The death last year of Matthew Simmons, author of Twilight in the Desert and a well-known peak oil advocate, offers an opportunity to review his work and draw a cautionary lesson.

Punditry

The nature of punditry has changed in the modern age, and for the worst. The original pundits were geographical surveyors in India, mostly natives working for the British, mapping areas where few Europeans dared to go (and from which many failed to return).…

Continue Reading

Matthew Simmons's 'Club of Rome' Epiphany (The strange case of an energy investment banker turned energy alarmist)

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- February 9, 2011

[Editor note: This (unpublished) review of “Revisiting The Limits to Growth: Could the Club of Rome Have Been Correct After All?” by Matthew R. Simmons (1943–2010) was written by Bradley in 2000.

Tomorrow, Michael Lynch will examine the Simmons’s peak-oil advocacy. A third post will described the failed bets that Simmons made with John Tierney of the New York Times and with Bradley on the average price of oil in 2010. (Simmons bet on $200 per barrel or higher averaged over 2010–and lost resoundingly.)]

Matt Simmons founded the investment banking firm Simmons & Company International soon after the 1973 energy crisis to cater to oil companies. He first stepped out in a very public way by questioning official inventory statistics for oil. But then he took a decidedly controversial turn (and one that befuddled his longtime industry friends). …

Continue Reading

Three Questions About Renewable Energy (false choices skew public opinion poll)

By Robert Peltier -- February 8, 2011

Several months ago, renewable energy advocates hailed a poll as unquestionably demonstrating the public’s support of renewable energy resources. However, answers to follow-up questions showed that the public’s willingness to pay for increased renewable energy is lukewarm at best. Therein lies the fickle support for government-dependent energy path that shines is one thing in the abstract and another in the real world.

The Financial Times/Harris poll, conducted online by Harris Interactive, surveyed household members who pay the energy bill each month in France, Germany, Great Britain, Spain, Italy, and the U.S. between September 15 and 21, 2010. They were asked three questions about their support of renewable energy.

Question 1: More Wind

The first question was, “How much do you favour or oppose a large increase in the number of wind farms in [your country]?”…

Continue Reading

A Cherry-Picker’s Guide to Temperature Trends Update: Warming Crisis Not

By Chip Knappenberger -- February 7, 2011
Continue Reading

Texas Power Outages: A Preliminary Analysis (Cold snap brings failure–isolated ERCOT an issue)

By Michael Giberson -- February 4, 2011
Continue Reading

80% "Clean" Energy by 2035: What Does This Mean?

By Ken Kok -- February 3, 2011
Continue Reading

Energy Price-Control Lessons for ObamaCare (remembering a classic WSJ editorial from 1979)

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- February 2, 2011
Continue Reading

'Gresham's Law of Green Energy' (Jonathan Lesser on bad energy driving out good)

By Eric Lowe -- February 1, 2011
Continue Reading

Section 1603 Extension: The Renewable Energy Bailout of 2011

By Lisa Linowes and Bill Short -- January 31, 2011
Continue Reading

Green Enron (Part IV Interview with Robert L. Bradley Jr.)

By -- January 28, 2011
Continue Reading