“5 Shades of Climate Denial” (Inside Climate News gets it wrong)

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- June 14, 2017 2 Comments

“Will Ms. Lavelle admit that global lukewarming is a valid area of scientific inquiry and conclusion; there are benefits, not only costs, to the human influence on climate; and ‘government failure’ exists alongside ‘market failure’ in the quest to ‘do something’? Adaptation to realistic scenarios, private sector as well as public, is an alternative to–and opportunity cost of–mitigation.”

The article by Marianne Lavelle, “5 Shades of Climate Denial, All on Display in the Trump White House,” a feature at Instide Climate News (June 9, 2017), deserves a second look. The good news is that a much more useful categorization that has been offered (by Richard Mueller, below) can be used to correct the unstudied, biased five categories presented in ICN.

Here are Lavelle’s five categories:

  1. “It’s Not Real”
  2. “‘It’s Not Our Fault,’ and Other Lighter Shades”
  3. “The Science Is Just Too Uncertain.
Continue Reading

Nixon Price Controls and Exiting Paris: A Bad Analogy (enslaved vs. freed energy)

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- June 13, 2017 1 Comment

“Until last week, Richard Nixon was responsible for the two worst-conceived American energy policies. On June 1, Donald Trump’s announcement of U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords displaced all competitors as the worst presidential initiative on energy in our nation’s history.”

– Hakes, “Quitting the Paris Climate Pact in Historical Perspective” (June 6, 2017)

“Historian Hakes got it exactly backwards. President Nixon violated economic law by imposing federal pricing on energy; President Trump removed an impetus to federal pricing for carbon-dioxide (CO2). Only if Trump had stayed in Paris would the Nixon analogy come into play.”

His bio line at Real Clear Energy reads: Jay Hakes is an energy historian who has worked for three presidents on energy issues. Experience aside, Mr. Hakes made just about the worst analogy possible regarding Donald Trump’s courageous decision to withdraw the United States from the redistributionist, toothless, ill-conceived Paris climate agreement.…

Continue Reading

Energy & Environmental Newsletter: June 12, 2017

By -- June 12, 2017 1 Comment

The Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions (AWED) is an informal coalition of individuals and organizations interested in improving national, state, and local energy and environmental policies. Our premise is that technical matters like these should be addressed by using Real Science (please consult WiseEnergy.org for more information).

A key element of AWED’s efforts is public education. Towards that end, every three weeks we put together a newsletter to balance what is found in the mainstream media about energy and the environment. We appreciate MasterResource for their assistance in publishing this information.

Some of the more important articles in this issue are:

“Climate Change” used to Create Totalitarian State

Anatomy of a Deep State

Renounce Climate Alarmism

Can we discuss the climate without the hysteria?

CO2 Can’t Cause the Warming Alarmists Claim it Does

Lindzen: In the future, people will marvel how hysterical mankind has been

CO2 Facts vs Alternative Facts

58 New Papers Invalidate Claims Of Unprecedented Modern Global Warming

mgh, Not Greenhouse Gases, Provides a Warm Earth

Defense Communities Celebrate Texas Military-Wind Law

The Princess and the Pea

Human Health, Rights and Wind Turbine Deployment

A startling case of two schools in proximity to wind turbines

Wind company dealt blow by Indiana Supreme Court

Why There’s No Such Thing As a Free Market for Electricity

Offshore Wind Turbines Blamed For Killing Family Of Whales

The Private Benefit of Carbon and its Social Cost

Scientific Peer-Review is a Deeply Tainted System

 

Greed Energy Economics:

Why There’s No Such Thing As a Free Market for Electricity

US Paid $1B to Green Climate Fund, Top Polluters Paid $0

Civitas files for NC Utility Commission Ruling

The Carbon Tax Rebate Scam

Renewable Jobs Claims Based On Deception, False Comparisons

Crony capitalism masquerading as trade protectionism in the solar industry

Paris pact withdrawal could slow clean technology investments

 

Turbine Health Matters:

Human Health, Rights and Wind Turbine Deployment

A startling case of two schools in proximity to wind turbines

Wind company dealt blow by Indiana Supreme Court

Wind developer stonewalls efforts for independent noise tests

Significant Vermont Public Service Board Appointment

Wind Turbines are an occupational Health Hazard to Workers:

Analysis of turbine aerodynamic sound noise…”

Assessment of turbine noise effects on the general health of staff…”

Freedom from Unwarranted Experimentation

Reproducing wind farm infrasound for subjective testing

Wind Energy Study’s Public Complaint Process Was Inadequate

 

Renewable Energy Destroying Ecosystems:

Offshore wind turbines blamed after three whales die off Suffolk

Offshore Wind Turbines Blamed For Killing Family Of Whales

Crop Scientist: Solar Projects Are Stressing Agriculture Ecosystem

 

Miscellaneous Energy News:

The Private Benefit of Carbon and its Social Cost

Defense Communities Celebrate Texas Military-Wind Law

The Princess and the Pea

Scientific Peer-Review is a Deeply Tainted System

Texas officials praise military base protection bill passage

Clean and Doable Liquid Fission (LF) Energy

Wasted green power tests China’s energy leadership

Britain’s on the brink of a small-scale nuclear reactor revolution

Why Are Global Warming Alarmists Afraid Of Nuclear Power?

Continue Reading

Direct Use of Natural Gas: Unshackle Efficiency from Obama’s ‘Deep Decarbonization’ (Part II)

By Mark Krebs and Tom Tanton -- June 8, 2017 12 Comments

“The fundamentally anti-fossil fuel energy efficiency and renewable energy advocates ran with Obama’s Executive Order 13693, Planning for Federal Sustainability in the Next Decade, to turn ‘deep decarbonization’ theories into official public policy. The goal? Convert all consumer natural gas use to electricity by 2050.”

“In short, U.S efforts within the DDPP infrastructure are orchestrated by the United Nations through one consulting firm, reviewed by two DOE labs, and funded by Tom Steyer. How’s that for a concentration of power in opposition to a free market economy?”

“Advocacy of ‘electrify everything’ and ‘Deep Decarbonization’ are still being funded by taxpayer dollars. While we assume the Trump Administration is not fully aware of this, the fact remains: This cannot be reconciled with the President’s America First Energy Plan to “lower costs for hardworking Americans and maximize the use of American resources.”

Continue Reading

Direct Use of Natural Gas: Unshackle Efficiency from Obama’s ‘Deep Decarbonization’ (Part 1)

By Mark Krebs and Tom Tanton -- June 7, 2017 9 Comments Continue Reading

To Live and Breath in Beijing

By Greg Rehmke -- June 5, 2017 1 Comment Continue Reading

Dear Elliott Negin: How About the Intellectual Debate? (Simmons/IER hit piece: big bark, little bite)

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- June 1, 2017 4 Comments Continue Reading

Glenn Schleede: Some Tributes (A long energy career that history will judge sustainable)

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- May 23, 2017 5 Comments Continue Reading

Energy & Environmental Newsletter: May 22, 2017

By -- May 22, 2017 1 Comment Continue Reading

Intellectual Vertigo: Trivia, Emotionalism in One Spot Check (taxpayers pay for this?)

By -- May 15, 2017 No Comments Continue Reading