A Free-Market Energy Blog

Texas Wind Power: Reality vs. Hype (despite burdensome state mandate, only a 1.2% share projected for 2014)

By Robert Bryce -- August 24, 2009

“The first great requisite of motive power is, that it shall be wholly at our command, to be exerted when, and where, and in what degree we desire. The wind, for instance, as a direct motive power, is wholly inapplicable to a system of machine labour, for during a calm season the whole business of the country would be thrown out of gear.”

– William Stanley Jevons,  The Coal Question (1865), p. 122.

Texas has repeatedly been lauded as a leader in wind power development. Some of that attention is deserved. In 2008, the state installed nearly 2,700 megawatts of new wind capacity. If Texas were an independent country, it would rank 6th in the world in terms of total wind power production capacity. But such growth is not the result of the free-market energy choices.…

Continue Reading

Two Energy Futures

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- August 22, 2009

[Editor Note: This piece was orginally published by the Institute for Energy Research and is reprinted with permission]

There are two futures for energy, depending on which socioeconomic system we adopt. The free-market promises a bright energy future, while the opposite path of political energy is dark. In that sense energy differs little from other goods and services (such as health care): its supply will depend on whether economic laws are allowed to work or are hampered by political intervention.

Free-Market Energy

As the late Julian Simon explained, the future for free-market energy is positive. “It’s reasonable to expect the supply of energy to continue becoming more available and less scarce, forever.”[1] So Simon said in his most influential book, The Ultimate Resource. This prediction riled his Malthusian critics, who labeled Simon a naïve romantic.…

Continue Reading

ObamaCare to ObamaEnergy: Questioning ‘Telephone-Book-Sized Legislation’

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- August 21, 2009

“The Republicans are right — it’s a cap-and-tax bill. That’s what it is because they are raising revenue to do all sorts of things, especially to take care of the coal industry, and it makes no sense.”

– Tim Wirth, “Climate Bill ‘Out of Control,’ Former Senator Says,” Bloomberg,  August 18, 2009.

“Trading of rights to pollute … introduces speculation and makes millionaires on Wall Street. I hope cap and trade doesn’t pass, because we need a much more effective approach.”

–  Remarks of James Hansen, 350 Climate Conference, Columbia University, May 4, 2009 [Speech writeup in Appendix below]

Left commentators are interpreting what has gone wrong with the Obama healthcare plan. One explanation is the sheer complexity of the legislation. “[Obama] had a near-Depression to deal with, and a banking crisis of mammoth proportions,” stated MSNBC’s Howard Fineman.

Continue Reading

Cap-and-Trade Creators Dubious of Waxman-Markey (SO2 vs. CO2; political failure vs. ‘market failure’)

By Robert Murphy -- August 20, 2009
Continue Reading

John Holdren: Energy “Indispensable,” “Reliable,” “Affordable” (so how does this square with Waxman–Markey?)

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- August 19, 2009
Continue Reading

John Holdren and the “Argument from Authority” (Revisited)

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- August 18, 2009
Continue Reading

John Holdren and Mineral/Energy Depletion (Revisited)

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- August 17, 2009
Continue Reading

John Holdren and Anti-Growth Malthusianism (Revisited)

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- August 15, 2009
Continue Reading

Data, Data, Who’s Got the Data? (A strange situation at Climate Research Unit, University of East Anglia)

By Kenneth P. Green -- August 14, 2009
Continue Reading

John Holdren and Global Warming (Revisited)

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- August 13, 2009
Continue Reading